When was carbon dating accepted by the scientific community

This process causes a proton to be displaced by a neutron, effectively turning atoms of Nitrogen it into an isotope of carbon – known as”radiocarbon”.It is naturally radioactive and unstable, and will therefore spontaneously decay back into N-14 over a period of time.The real problem in this situation lies in trying to determine if the proponents of the given strata-age are real scientists, or merely disciples of the faith of Scientism, play-acting at being real scientists.The only way to do that is to listen very carefully to their words, and how they state their case.Not to worry; this phase is converting them all, one by one.

As the decay rate for each radioactive isotope is known, it is possible to calculate how long the process has been taking place for a given specimen under examination.

It has the near unanimous support of all of the fellows of TTRSTF , who will harrumph about it and support what, when pressed, they will refer to as conjecture, because the term conjecture sounds so much more scientific than the term very popular wild assed guess.

In general, if a proposed conjecture regarding the age of a rock or a radioactively-dead fossil or a strata layer supports a given scientistic dogma, then that conjecture will enjoy immediate, unchallenged, and near unanimous support from the recognized scientific community.

Aging anything on Earth in the hundreds of thousands of years, or in the millions or beyond, involves little more than educated conjecture. A Guess never rises above the level of being a guess, no matter how scientific, no matter how educated, no matter how much consensus it enjoys, no matter how well it "fits" any popular hypothesis.

Even with full, 100% consensus in the scientific community, in the absence of any empirical evidence, conjecture still remains conjecture.